| The Lesotho Lowlands Water Supply Scheme | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Another giant water project is set to take off with the introduction of the Lesotho Lowlands Water Supply Scheme aimed at addressing the domestic, industrial and agricultural water needs of the lowland districts of Botha Bothe, Leribe, Berea, Maseru, Mafeteng, Mohale's Hoek and Quthing. Within the Scheme is the fast-tracked Metolong Dam Project, intended mainly to augment water supply to Maseru and the peri-urban areas around it. The Lowlands Water Supply Scheme Unit was established in April 2002 within the Department of Water Affairs of the Ministry of Natural Resources, to coordinate and expedite the implementation of the Scheme.
INTRODUCTION
A number of national studies have
recommended that Government of Lesotho (GoL) give serious consideration to
options for providing additional secure water supplies to the bulk of its
people, who live in the western lowlands area. In part, the high priority
given the project is due to the burgeoning demand for water in Lesotho, and
is heightened by the growing demands from towns and cities in the
neighbouring Republic of South Africa (RSA), many of which rely on the same
basic sources of bulk water. It is expected that the European Union,
through its development cooperation programmes with Lesotho, will be a major
supporter of any future programme of action and investment in this field.
To secure a potable water supply,
the GoL has embarked on a project, the Lesotho Lowlands Water Supply Scheme
(LLWSS) and a comprehensive feasibility study of water needs for domestic,
industrial and agricultural use in the lowlands region of Lesotho. The GoL
has secured resources needed to undertake the study from the European
Commission.
The Lowlands Water Supply Scheme
Unit (LWSSU) has been established within the Department of Water Affairs in
the Ministry of Natural Resources to coordinate and expedite the
implementation of the LLWSS. The outcome
of the study will provide the GoL with the opportunity to decide on the most
suitable and appropriate infrastructure development option for securing
future water supply schemes in the lowlands and to follow up with the
implementation of the measures required. 2.0
INSTITUTIONAL FRAME WORK The Lowlands Water Supply Scheme Unit was established within the Department of Water Affairs on the 1stApril 2002 with the approval of Cabinet and formal engagement of the Chief Executive. Three additional Technical Officers were engaged later in the program. The four form the management team for the Unit. The Organogram of the Unit currently stands as follows: SUPPORT STAFF Personal Secretary Mrs. J. Nyapholi (Full time) Office Driver Mr. M. Mokhethi (Full time) Stores Assistant Ms. N. Rantja (Full time) Office Assistant Mrs. M. Libe (Full time) Senior Accountant Mrs. M. Molapo (MNR) Assistant Personal Secretary Mrs. A.K. Matia (MNR) Accounts Assistant Mrs. E. M. Moketetsa (MNR)
Stores
Assistant Ms. M. Lekhooa
(MNR)
2.1 RESOURCES
2.2
PROJECT STEERING
COMMITTEE
To facilitate the smooth running
of the project and also to offer technical backstopping; a Project Steering
Committee was built into the operational modalities of the Study Contract.
The proposed Committee comprises institutions within the Lesotho Water
Sector; which are stakeholders in the project, as well as other beneficiary
institutions. As the study progressed, there was need to co-opt other
relevant member institutions as observers. The Steering Committee currently
comprises the following Institutions: · Department of Water Affairs · Department of Rural Water Supply · Water and Sewage Authority · Lesotho Highlands Water Commission and LHDA · Ministry Of Tourism, Culture and Environment – NES · Ministry Of Health And Social Welfare – Environmental Health Division · Ministry of Local Government – Directorate of Decentralisation · Ministry of Food Security – Department of Crops · Ministry of Forestry and Land Reclamation · Policy, Planning and Strategy Unit (MNR)
·
Lesotho Council of NGOs
(Co-opted member)
The Deputy Principal Secretary for
the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Commissioner of Water attend
Steering Committee sessions by virtue of their positions as members of the
Ministerial Management Team.
The study consultants sit with the
Steering Committee quarterly to present quarterly-progress reports. Apart
from the quarterly- progress reports, the Steering Committee is responsible
for the final review of all submitted reports and their subsequent approval.
2.3.1 OTHER TECHNICAL
BACKSTOPPING MECHANISMS
Apart from the Steering Committee,
the Lowlands Water Supply Scheme Unit gets technical support from a team of
local Engineering Consultants, MAFUBE CONSULTING PTY LTD. The engagement of
Mafube was part of an initiative to maximise the participation of Basotho in
the initial stages of the project implementation. They were identified
through a limited tendering process that involved local engineering
consulting houses.
The European Union has also
accorded the LWSSU access to one of its Technical Advisors.
2.4 BILATERAL COOPERATION WITH
RSA
Following discussions between the
Hon. Minister of Natural Resources and his counterpart in the Republic of
South Africa (RSA), the two countries agreed in principle to collaborate in
the implementation of the Lesotho Lowlands Water Supply Scheme. This was
done in view of the fact that the Terms of Reference for the Lesotho
Lowlands Water Supply Scheme study included coverage of some neighbouring
RSA towns.
In order to facilitate this
collaboration, a working forum was put in place for the necessary
groundwork, the Interim Lowlands Water Supply Scheme Commission. The Interim
Commission is made up of six permanent members, three from Lesotho and three
from RSA. The Lesotho members are DPS-Ministry of Natural Resources,
Commissioner of Water and Director-LWSSU. Other members are co-opted as and
when need arises in terms of their area of specialisation.
In its early stages, the interim
Commission realised that the current Lesotho Feasibility Study had
shortfalls in terms of addressing needs in RSA. It was then agreed that RSA
would conduct an independent parallel Feasibility Study and the two studies
will then be aligned at a later stage to result in a common implementation
program. It was further observed that there would be a need to carry out a
wider Scoping Study that covers territory in both countries. The results of
such a Scoping Study would then be used to gauge shortfalls within both
parallel Feasibility Studies. Once identified and addressed, a joint
implementation program for the envisaged project would commence. The two
countries agreed that an individual country would finance the Feasibility
Studies, whereas for the joint Scoping Study, there would be joint funding. A Technical Management Committee (TMC) – the operational arm of the Interim Commission was formed, comprising two members from each country. The responsibility of the TMC amongst others was to draft terms of reference for the Scoping Study. The terms of reference have been produced and the Interim Commission has to decide on a shortlist of reputable consultants to be invited to tender for the Scoping Study.
3.0
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PROGRESS TO DATE
The Lesotho Lowlands Water Supply Scheme in
general will address the needs of water in the lowlands districts of Maseru,
Berea, Leribe, Botha-Bothe, Mafeteng, Mohales' Hoek and Quthing. Within the
Scheme is the fast tracked Metolong Dam Project, intended
mainly to augment water supply to Maseru. The project, funded by the Arab
Bank for Economic Development in Africa (BADEA) and co-funded by the GoL,
will also investigate the possibilities of Hydropower Generation. The
Metolong Study Contract was initially for a period of six months, but the
consultants requested a two months extension, submitting their Draft Final
Report in September. The wider Lesotho Lowlands Feasibility Study is funded
under a grant from the European Development Fund. Half way through, the
consultants submitted an Intermediate Report.
3.1
SERVICE CONTRACT
PROCUREMENT PROCEDURE
The process of Request For Proposals (RFP)
started in February 2002. Submission of proposals by the bidding firms and
the opening of Technical Proposals took place on the 15thMay,
2002. The following firms submitted their proposals:
A National Evaluation Team was established to
undertake the evaluation process, which started on the 3rd June,
to 28th June, 2002. The National Evaluation Team comprised the
following institutions:
The evaluation report was submitted to Ministry of Planning on the 5thJuly, 2002. Concurrently with the Ministry of Natural Resources Evaluation, the European Union (EU) also appointed an independent evaluator. The independent evaluator submitted his evaluation report of the technical proposals on the 2nd August 2002.
The Lowlands Water Supply Scheme
Unit reconciled the two reports and prepared a Final Technical Evaluation
Report, which was in turn submitted to the Ministry of Planning on the 23rd
September 2002.
The financial proposal of the two
pre-qualified firms: Parkman Ltd. – UK and GKW – Germany was opened on the
26thSeptember, 2002. The subsequent evaluation was done on the
27th September 2002. On the 9th October 2002, the
overall proposal (Financial and Technical) of Parkman (Ltd) – UK was
approved by the Government of Lesotho and the European Union. A Service
Contract to undertake the Feasibility Study for the scheme was signed on the
11thDecember, 2002.
The consultants started
mobilisation work on the 6thJanuary, 2003. The first Review
Workshop in preparation for the Inception Report was held on the 31st
January 2003. The preview of the Inception Report was submitted on
the 7th February 2003.
Lowlands Water Supply Scheme
technical staff and the consultants have weekly Project Meetings, an
important component of the Study’s supervision mechanisms. It is in these
meetings that operational problems are discussed and the consultants’
progress monitored.
3.2 STUDY APPROACH AND MAJOR
FINDINGS TO DATE
The first component of the study
involved literature review and the aligning of the consultants’ Technical
Proposal with reality on the ground. This analysis culminated in the
submission of an Inception Report that was later endorsed by the Client,
(Lowlands Water Supply Scheme Unit, on behalf of the PS- Ministry of Natural
Resources).
The study team went on to divide
their work into the following areas, which studied specific components of
the Study area:
3.2.1
Summary of findings to
Date
Population and the Impact of
HIV and AIDS
The terms of reference had clearly
indicated the major role that the impact of HIV and AIDS can have on future
water demand projections; hence this had to be studied in detail as a
limiting factor. The consultants had planned to use an Actuary Science-based
HIV and AIDS Impact model (ASSA2000) developed at the University of Cape
Town, but were not able to use this method due to non-availability of data
from the Lesotho Bureau of Statistics. They however settled for the use of
an alternative model called SPECTRUM from the USA.
The results from the model
highlighted what was already feared, revealing that by the year 2015, using
high and low prevalence scenarios, there will be between 375 000 and 422 000
individuals infected with the HIV/AIDS. In terms of deaths, the model
predicts that there will be about 650 000 AIDS related deaths in Lesotho by
2015, thus reducing demand for domestic water supplies. However, the study’s
demographic team predicts that this decrease in general population will not
necessarily decrease rural to urban migration. Therefore, it is still
expected that there will still be increased water demand within urban
centres. The Metolong feasibility study team also shares this analogy. One aspect that the study team are cautioning the Government of Lesotho about is the increase in the number of people who will require subsidised or free water as the HIV and AIDS prevalence is high in the productive age groups of 15-49 years.
Water Demand
In order to project water demands
for the study area, the consultants first looked at the water consumption
history of the area as well as the amount of water yielded by the existing
systems. After determining the current water demand, this was correlated
with the current population to come up with a per capita water usage.
The next step involved the projection of future water usage based on a pre
calculated population rate, determined from aerial photography, due to the
inaccuracy of census data. For areas that did not have current water supply,
the World Health Organization standard of 50litres per capita was used. The
resulting figures were then corrected for water loss using a conservative
percentage of 30% loss. For those areas that are intended for future
industrial expansions, data was collected from the Lesotho National
Development Corporation (LNDC). LNDC provided estimated projected water
demands for its industrial estates based on current water consumption per
hectare. The complexity faced by the consultants in estimating industrial
water demand will be highlighted later (section 3.4). The consultants went on to divide the study area into eight (8) demand zones. The zones and their subsequent projected water demands for the required time horizons of 2020 and 2035 are as follows:
* A
zone depicts an Urban Centre and village clusters en-route, with a
population of 2 500 and more.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) EIA
related activities have been restricted to the production of a Background
Information Document (BID) that was distributed in June 2003. This document
was intended to inform stakeholders about general environment related
concerns usually associated with large dam schemes. It is intended that the
wealth of knowledge that will be accrued as result of this publication will
result in more meaningful participation by the nation during public
consultation processes when specific and penultimate schemes have been
selected for detailed study.
Hydrology and Choice of Scheme
These two entities were studied as
stand alone components, but will here be dealt with concurrently as their
joined inputs resulted in the preliminary choice of schemes. The consultants
studied the hydrology of three catchments areas namely Mohokare Catchment,
Makhaleng Catchment and the Senqu Catchment. After determining the potential
yield of the riverine systems on these catchments, they set out to locate
potential dam sites closest to the eight demand zones as pre determined. In
each demand zone, 3-4 dam sites were identified. The intension was that
later in the study, the process of elimination of these dam sites would
remain with the optimum sites in terms of cost, environmental impacts and
suitability of site in Geotechnical terms. Work is currently under way to
home-down on the more attractive dam sites for further studies. In general
the identified choices of schemes can be summarised as follows:
The consultants’ report shows that
this summary has been developed from a total of fourteen potential water
supply scheme combinations. The options are based on using water sources
from Mohokare River, Makhaleng River, Senqu River, the transfer of water
into the existing Mohale Dam and the use of Lesotho Highlands Project
waters. Further investigations will be made on the potential of ground and
surface water as sources of supply to the proposed systems. 3.3
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
As part of the Contract, the
consultants have to transfer some skills to locals as part of a capacity
building program. To this effect twelve candidates were nominated from the
Water Sector Institutions in the country. They come from the following
Institutions: Department of Water Affairs - 7 candidates Department of Rural Water Supply - 1 candidate Department of Energy - 3 candidates Department of
Meteorological Services - 1 candidate The study
team’s training expert evaluated the CVs of all the candidates in order to
come up with a practical training program for the candidates. The expert
came up with a programme comprising the following courses: · Water Resources Assessment Planning · Water Supply Management and Operations
·
Social, Economic and
Environmental Impacts of Water Supply Schemes
Apart from the formal structured
training programme, the candidates are due for secondment with the study
team group relevant to their field of expertise. One syndicate will be
attached to the Environment and Social group, another to the Water Resources
Assessment group, another to the Engineering and Planning group and yet
another attached to the Data Management and GIS group. To date, two training sessions have taken place: the first in Hydrology and the other, in Integrated Environment Management. There are also plans for some training in Durban before the end of the year. A candidate from the Meteorological Services Department has already completed a two weeks attachment with the consultant’s offices in Pretoria. For the month of October, the syndicate for Environment and Social issues is jointly undertaking an Environment Scoping Exercises for all potential Dam sites with the consultant. 3.4
INTERMEDIATE REPORT REVIEW MEETING
A report review meeting
was held where the consultants presented to the project Steering Committee
and other stakeholders, findings to date. Here the stakeholders were
expected to present their comments to the consultant regarding the report
under review. At this meeting the consultant made presentations on
Demographics, Hydrology, Various Schemes Options and the Multiple Criteria
Decision Analysis (MCDA) process. Following the discussion of the
consolidated comments from the stakeholders as well as those that came out
during the meeting, further communication will be made with the consultant
to fine tune the report and to respond to specific queries.
3.4.1 ISSUES OF CONCERN RAISED
BY CONSULTANTS
A.
One of the options
identified by the consultants involves the use of Lesotho Highlands Water
Project resources, administered under a Treaty jointly signed by the
Governments of Lesotho and the Republic of South Africa. This matter needs
careful consideration by the Government of Lesotho as it entails
re-negotiation of the Treaty and subsequent re aligning of royalties from
the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP). In the light of a dire need to
supply water to the industrial nodes of Botha-Bothe, Maputsoe, Maseru and
Mohale’s Hoek to meet the requirements of industrial developments, the
consultants identified LHWP water as the quickest solution to this problem.
B.
The consultants have
expressed a concern regarding the ever-changing industrial water demands as
projected by the LNDC. This state of affairs makes it difficult for them to
optimise the sizes of reservoirs required per demand node. Several changes
have already been made; but this at a cost to the Study’s implementation
schedule. The consultants have requested major role players in the Water
Sector to come to an agreement on what will be the demanded designs. To this
effect, the consultants suggested the holding of a workshop at which the
private sector will also be invited so that potential project funding
partners can be identified. C. The process of eliminating the identified options is going to involve the use of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) model. This model involves the use of weighting factor to all potential project-limiting factors. The weight given to each component has to be agreed upon by the stakeholders and NOT the consultants.
4.0 WAY FORWARD The consultants have indicated in their Intermediate Report that further investigations are still needed before they can come up with the penultimate schemes for the Lowlands Water Supply Scheme. Work in the next months will involve more detailed technical, hydrological, economic and socio-environmental analyses of the “short listed” options. Important Project data
Project Title:
Feasibility Study
for Lowlands Water Supply Scheme Project Objective: To determine the optimum programme of investment that will secure medium-long term water supply for human and industrial consumption in the lowlands of Lesotho by developing the water resources, treatment and transport of water to demand centres. This will support socio-economic development and assist in poverty reduction and health improvements. Funding Agency : European Commission under EDF-8 Budget : EURO 1,600,000.00 Study Duration : 18 Months
Implementing
Consultant:
Parkman (Ltd) UK
in association with Sechaba Consultants
Commencement
Date: 6th January 2003
Study Outcome
: The Report will
make the following recommendations · Prioritised, justified and technically viable costed development option to address water supply problems · Tender Dossiers for detailed design · Institutional Arrangement and Management Procedures for improved water supply systems · Capacity Building Programmes Progress Summary
Lowlands Water supply Scheme
Feasibility Study 15/05/2002 - Submission and Opening of Proposals 03/06/2002 - Commencement of Technical Evaluation Process 05/07/2002 - Submission of Technical Evaluation Report 22/07/2002 - Rejection of National Evaluation Report by EU 28/07/2002 - Commencement of Evaluation Process by EU Independent Consultant 02/08/2002 - Submission of Evaluation Report by EU Independent Consultant 12/09/2002 to 13/09/2002 - Reconciliation of Two (2) Evaluation Reports by Two Evaluation Teams 23/09/2002 - Submission of Final Evaluation Report by Ministry of Natural Resources to Ministry of Development Planning6/09/2002 - Opening of Financial Proposal of the Pre-qualified Firm; Parkman (Ltd) UK 27/09/2002 - Financial Evaluation of Parkman (Ltd) UK Tender 09/10/2002 - Approval of Parkman (Ltd) UK Proposal by both the GoL and EU 11/12/2003 - Service Contract Signing 06/01/2003 - Mobilisation Work at Lesotho Office 31/01/2003 - Review Workshop by Consultants 24/04/2003 - Presentation of preliminary lowlands water supply options to LHDA 01/05/2003 - Reconnaissance visit to Metolong valley archaeological sites 01/05/2003 - Submission of 2nd Progress report 24/06/2003 - Project Steering Committee meeting to discuss 2nd progress report. 25/06/2003 - Presentation of Background Information Document to Stakeholder 10-11/06/2003 - 1st Public Consultation Workshop 14/09/2003 - Submission of Intermediate Report incorporating 3rd Quarterly Report. 08/10/2003 - Project Steering Committee meeting to discuss Intermediate Report
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||